Eu4 ideal army composition.

5. sacrich_cc. • 4 yr. ago. As everything with EU it’s pretty complicated, here’s a doc telling you the optimal comp for every tech. 3. BaronWalrus1. • 4 yr. ago. Build a combat width stack with 2 or 4 cavalry depending on your economy give it 3 artillery as well so you can barrage capital forts. The rest of your FL can be saved for ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... In point of army composition nothing changed for years except maybe some special units but they are not very important. You can find tons of posts about army composition in this subreddit. Baseline is get as much artillery as you can afford and cav only if you are rich or a horde/PolandOverall, as long as the first army isn't crushed, you should be fine. And now that I've thought about it, going 12/8/10 or 10/10/10 should be fine for the PLC, simply because they can do so without incurring the insufficient support modifier as easily as a western nation might. With the PLC, (especially a Polish-led PLC) cavalry can reach up to ...Sep 2, 2020 · Heavies only is the ideal naval composition. Naval engagement width has a base of 25. It is not increased by tech, unlike army combat width. It is only increased by a couple of policies you'll never use (because they both require Naval idea group), as well as a context based 10% increase in coastal seas.

Army composition = (A = W) + 4C + (Ax2 or Ax3)I, where A (rtillery), W (idth of combat), C (avalry) and I (fantry). Basically I use double or triple my artillery in infantry. Using a "spare" army to follow your arty is smart, because it allows you …

I see all these posts with people asking about the ideal army composition, and others reply saying you need the same number of infantry and artillary as your combat width (or some such), but how do I actually find out what my combat width is? ... Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Your army composition depends on the current tech level and group as well as many other factors, but the simpliest way to know how they should look is 2/4/6 cavalry regiments along with about 2 to 3 times as much infantry and no more artillery than cav and inf combined. example: 8 infantry 4 cavalry 12 artillery ...

Then mutiply the result by your current combat width. Create that many cavalry. Then take combat width and subtract the cavalry number for infantry. Then create artillery equal to combat width. The result is the ideal composition with a buffer. You can then reduce the army size by maintaining the ratio you just created.This video explains the best EU4 Army Composition by Century starting from your 1444 army to the 1821 end date, with an army reform every 50 years or so. ️ ...Hello! I've been playing the EU series fairly consistently since the end of EU III's cycle, but I still feel like I don't completely understand the ideal army composition. Currently, I use armies of twenty units: eight infantry, four cavalry, and...Each type of unit has a specific amount they can loot from a province each monthly tick (I can't recall the numbers offhand, sorry). From the fastest to slowest looting speeds it goes cavalry>infantry>cannons. So if you have a cav heavy army you're going to chew up the loot bar faster than if you had a cannon heavy army.

Here, a minimum of 4 cavalry units (2 on each side) is required. The dynamic changes for the last time at level 30, where 6 cavalry units will be required for maximize flanking. For example: Early game: 8 infantry, 2 cavalry, 5 artillery. Mid game: 18 infantry, 2 cavalry, 10 artillery.

Recruiting w/e banner they throw you at and use the excess ones at looting/carpet siege/colony native uprising. Of course, if you don't spend time genociding and developing the Manchu culture area growing your banner population as Confucian Qing, your banner sizes won't grow between the banner idea unlock and the 50% banner age ability in Age ...

The help thread has a list of resources, including one on army composition based on tech level. Reply. JackNotOLantern. •. Levels 1-15: 4 cav and rest of combat width infantry. At Level 7 add 1-10 cannons for siege. Level 16+: add full combat width of cannons. You may do a siege stack 10/0/10 for fast sieges before Level 16.The right army composition can be the deciding factor between victory and defeat. Here are some tips on how to create the best army compositions in EU4. The …Eventually I am thinking i'll get Quality for my fourth idea just to make my army/navy stronger but I had a question. After my recent multi-army stack wipe from the Ottomans even with French support I am concerned I might not be building my armies properly. Currently I just did 15 infantry/5 Cavalry/5 Artillery. Is there a better composition?We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.Stay 0/1/1. Make sure you stack to at least -80% cavarly cost reduction so all your cavalry costs 5 ducat to recruit. (maintenance cost scales with recruitment cost)Flagships have the possibility to give +3 base engagement width. Each point of maneuver of your admiral increases the engagement width by 10%. So basically you have to adapt the fleet composition to the level of your admirals. Heavy ships count for three slots in your engagement width while other ships (light, galleys and transport) count for 1.Jul 15, 2015 · Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly heavy battles, and I also often like to construct ...

Swap some cavalry for cannons. You dont really need more than 2 cavalry per stack until late game unless you have cavalry bonuses from ideas. My rule of thumb is to check your combat width (tech tab) and use that as a minimum amount of infantry+cavalry. Then i add half as many cannons as that front line is wide.So I always go the same with my army. Fullfill the combat width with infantry and 15-25% cavalery. Before tech 13 you only need one artillery (for the siege bonus) otherwise it will be a waste of money, they ain't that powerful before this time. After, you can remove your cavalery and put more artillery in your army composition.My understanding from what I remember is that your cavalry/infantry ratio effectively lets you have a certain number of cavalry attacking compared to your combat width, so if you have 12 combat width and 25% C:I ratio, you can have 4 cavalry dealing flanking damage.Heavies take up 3 width, galleys 0.33, and light ships 1. Heavies offer the most punch per naval force limit; galleys in inland seas are most efficient per engagement width. So optimize according to your constraints and where you’d need to fight (Baltic Sea is inland, but if you venture into the North Sea it’s not); most likely with heavies.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... You don't run around with armies built to max width + composition. You do fight that way. You don't take attrition while fighting in a battle, so the supply limit doesn't matter at that time. ... I've almost always used groups with a 2-1-1 ratio, and would use army sizes in powers of two up to the max normal supply ... 16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.

4. Sweet-Molasses-3059. • 3 yr. ago. So by the time the bonuses kick in (ideas,traditions etc) you won't have 20 combat width. You want to start with 4 cav, then look at your flanking ability, this would be 25%,50% or 0% at the early stages of the game. You want to add 2 cav per 25% flanking ability and the rest infantry.

It's not bad at all, you get -10% from Manchu traditions and -20% from Cossack estate. Hordes reinforce for free, so they don't have to pay extra to keep their numbers up during wars.After trying out several failed campaigns, the one thing that bothers me most is army performance. I've always assumed that all western European nations have the same western technology level (though the exact starting techs may differ) and hence access to the same military unit types at the start. A few years after starting however, I find there were times when my bigger armies lost to a ...The best army composition is infantry equal to combat width plus artillery equal to combat width. Cavarly don't actually do much more damage in most cases at most tech levels, so scrap them unless you're Poland or a horde. You can skip out on the artillery until mil tech 16 or so.R5: In the upcoming 1.30 Patch/Emperor DLC which will be released on the 9th of June 2020 the new Hegemonies mechanic will be added to the game. There are three different types of Hegemony to claim. Each of them gives powerful bonuses to the Country which claims it and one Country can only ever hold the claim to one Hegemony.Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... But i have a question about the ideal army composition for sweden (both early and lategame) and what ideas i should take. And also is there any other way to get the vasa dynasty than ...What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? ... Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by lescribanot90. Ideal Army Compositions? What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? I understand that having just 1 artillery unit gives a ...In this video I delve into proper army compositions. I give general tips and show several examples of good army builds that can be used in your campaigns. I ...

Aug 26, 2014 · Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.

Duh. The US Army has concluded that Iran was the only victor of the eight-year US campaign to remove Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and replace him with a democratic regime. That’s...

Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...Here, a minimum of 4 cavalry units (2 on each side) is required. The dynamic changes for the last time at level 30, where 6 cavalry units will be required for maximize flanking. For example: Early game: 8 infantry, 2 cavalry, 5 artillery. Mid game: 18 infantry, 2 cavalry, 10 artillery.You either go full infantry and convert to Hindu for 20% CCR or no-syncretic Tengri, Horde idea group, and stack cav cost reduction to the max to make cavalry cost 5 ducats and get 100% cav/inf ratio.I'm a new player and I was just wondering about the ideal army compositions,, especially for Russia if it's nation specific ... This spreadsheet have good army composition and can direct you to more in-depth guide: ... r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by ...Oh look, Russian army composition at its finest. R5: Russian infantry greatly outnumbers their cavalry. Russian army composition is actually better than yours, that late into the game artillery is what makes the difference and after that all you need is a filled front row with whatever with infantry being a lot cheaper as mercs than cavalry.Nahuatl just gets -2 unrest. A bunch of countries get ideas that give more tolerance though not terribly many are ideal WC candidates. And there's government types. Legitimacy can give +1 to all tolerances (which pairs wonderfully with -3 unrest from legitimacy and possibly another -1 unrest from kingdom type). ... r/eu4 • Ideal army ...This is guide for everything land warfare.Discord: https://discord.gg/kHQKyNgddHTimestamps:00:00 The basics01:29 Generals02:46 Wargoals03:13 How do battles w...I think the generally accepted simple composition is: Infantry - 2 less than combat width. Cavalry - 2. Artillery - combat width. In early game artillery is weak so you just need 1 or 2 with each army for sieges, in mid to late game start increasing artillery to full combat width.But no matter the country, that composition of 16/4/5 is not optimal, you have far too many infantry and too little artillery. In a previous comment on this thread you say that you're in the late game. So the composition you would want is 20/0/20 or 22/0/20 ideally.A lot of you asked me for war-related EU4 guides. I'm always happy to help you so today we are going to start with guide about Army Composition. Next one in ...

Active-Cow-8259. • 1 yr. ago. 1.35 doesnt really Change Combat as far as I know. If you dont know much about composition Here is the most important stuff. You should allways try to fill the combat with (cw) in the front row (infrantry + cavalery). The backrow is only used by the artillery, so artillery allways adds extra damage, however ...Army composition will change as technology changes, as combat width will be increased (base is 25) and unit strength will get shifted. Cavalry is the best at game start, but will lose its power/price ratio around mid game, so people use as many as their economy and tech group can afford (100% for nomad, 80% muslim, 60% eastern, and 50% rests) at the start, but only use 2~4 later for the extra ...Europa Universalis IV. ... 2.What is the ideal army composition type like say for eg 1 artillery and 1 cav unit for every 3 infantry units for optimal perfromance, assuming the supply cap is not exceeded? ... Army composition is less of an issue before artillery becomes a thing, but the right cavalry ratio can still make a big difference ...It's accurate to have wastelands in these provinces for balance, but also 2 other reasons: 1: They were isolated, 'undiscovered' or otherwise inaccesible well into the 19th century, it would be ahistorical for them to be provinces. 2: Technology didn't allow these areas to be colonised. Railways and steam vessels were a major development that ...Instagram:https://instagram. sky protection reviewselite nails hartford wisconsinhorny people snapchatbilly jacobs paintings There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s. hawaii dates persona 5hip hop fish and chicken albany photos The first step in the Army’s composite risk management (CRM) process is to identify hazards. This helps determine the risk involved and the most effective way to determine controls...Then it is recommended to have the following army composition: Full first row of Infantry / Cavalry (30 units with mil tech 16) Second row with as much Artillery as you can afford. Basically in the late game, when your combat width is at 40, you should have the following army composition: 40k infantry + 40k artillery. 1980 playmate of the year Aristocratic, Aristocratic-Econ, Trading in Livestock/Iron, and no-Syncretic Tengri, will cut down the cost from 10/25/30 to 7.5/11.25/22.5, or 12.5% more cost on 0/1/1 vs 1/0/1. Even without Econ, the cost would only be 21% higher, while your damage increase and manpower saved will far outweights the 21% cost. Then there are your filthy banners.But after 1.33 the composition doesn't seem to work as good as before. I barely win any fights and in most of my fights it seems like I'm starting with half the morale of my enemy. I've read the dev diaries and if I understand it correctly, the combat changes make filling up combat width more important than it was before the update.I heard 3/1/1 but don't quote me on that. There is no penalty for having a wonky army comp rn so mostly artillery and some lancers for offensive armies. And infantry only for defensive armies, the AI doesn't really build cavalry or artillery so your infantry will be more than enough to defend.